Team members receive clear expectations, which creates capable, productive people who can coach others. Imagine offering personal mentoring to a team of 100 people. Not only does it take a long time, but it also requires a lot of patience. Managers often have very little time to complete assigned tasks and much less time to help each member of the team gain skills in what they should do.
With this in mind, it's important that you establish a scope before implementing the coaching leadership style. One approach may be to train future coaches to create an outreach effect that isn't based on you being the only coach in the organization. If you try to do everything at once, you might not have any impact in the end. A lack of time can ruin the best intentions; the coaching leadership style simply requires a lot of time on an individual basis. Andrew Carnegie, 1835-1919, was best known for his wealth and philanthropy.
However, it also played a critical role in Charles Schwab's rise in the steel industry. Schwab's career began when he was working as an engineer at the Carnegie Steel Company. Carnegie began advising and training Schwab when Schwab became a manager and this mentoring ultimately prompted Schwab to be named president of the company. Not being clear about decisions and objectives is one of the biggest obstacles that people encounter.
A good coach will help you be specific and clear about what you want and how to achieve it. Coaching leaders can quickly identify a team member's weakness and implement a plan to help that team member transform that weakness into a strength, or at least raise awareness about the weakness to limit the consequences. Not only does this improve productivity levels and the quality of the work done, but it also lays the foundation for future leaders to continue using the coaching leadership style when they can rise to a managerial position. While it takes time, having one-on-one conversations with employees will give you a better idea of each individual's needs.
In addition to the characteristics of the coaching leadership style, these are the main advantages and disadvantages to consider. Knowing the pros and cons of coaching, as well as the cost, will help you make the informed decision you need. A stressful crisis situation in which decisions must be immediate and the consequences of the error of judgment are severe would be a typical situation in which the coaching leadership style is not appropriate. It is difficult to implement leadership coaching strategies with large groups, since it is practically impossible for the leader to connect on a deep and personal level with a large number of people due to time constraints.
In addition, cause and effect can be confusing and confusing, making it difficult to quickly calibrate the training style. As concluded in the literature section of an article by Berg and Karlsen at the BI Norwegian Business School, there are few concrete descriptions and research on the leadership style of coaching. Behavioral scientist Paul Hersey and management expert Ken Blanchard conceptualized leadership as part of their situational leadership model that they developed in 1969.
Leave a Comment