A Comprehensive Guide to 3 Types of Coaching

Coaching is a powerful tool for helping people reach their goals and achieve success. It is a process of guiding and supporting individuals to identify and reach their desired objectives. There are three main types of coaching: democratic, autocratic, and bureaucratic. Each style has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the best approach depends on the individual's needs and goals.

Democratic coaching is a collaborative approach that puts the client in control. The coach provides the momentum and support needed to achieve tangible objectives, while the client takes responsibility for their own progress. This style is ideal for financial advice, career advice, and personal growth advice. Autocratic coaching is a more directive approach that places authority in the hands of the coach.

This style is best suited for situations where the coach has the experience and knowledge needed to dictate the conditions. It is often used in organizational training in disciplined and regulated environments such as government and public sector bodies. Bureaucratic coaching follows a more traditional approach that is driven by processes and systems. This style is often used in law firms or hospitals, where deviating from a process could have serious consequences.

Holistic Coaching

Holistic coaching focuses on the overall growth of the person, giving equal importance to all aspects of their life. The coach's job is to ask the right questions and provide support and encouragement. This style is best suited to situations in which the client seeks to create lasting results in their overall life.

Development Coaching

Development coaching involves understanding the “what”, “why”, and “how” of your client.

The coach uses 360-degree feedback and questions to understand the client's past experiences and assess where they are in their development process. This style takes into account the client's age, mental age, and thought processes.

Authoritarian Coaching

Authoritarian coaching is an intense approach that often works better situationally than as a consistent practice. It requires strong values, morals, and priorities that reflect what they intend to inculcate in their players.

This type of training can take time to achieve results and there is potential for deeper emotional problems to be triggered.